To let others know how different setups are coming along with the PC benchmark found in the demo, please post your setup and the Avg. FPS and Max FPS you got.
Mine:
GTX 1080
FX 8320 (OC’ed to 4.2ghz)
8gb DDR3 1866mhz
EDIT: To clarify, these stats are going to advanced and putting everything as high as possible. Running dynamic with “ultra” turned on in basic is easier on the hardware and still looks great. See 3rd comment for those stats.
Ultra @ 4k
Avg FPS: 28
Max FPS 32
(I’m really hoping to see what someone with a GTX 1080, Ryzen 5 1600x, and 16gb DDR4 3200mhz is getting as this is what I can afford to upgrade to)
Agreed Vulcan but I’m at a point where I have to take things one step at a time. The next upgrade will be a new motherboard, 16gb of DDR4 and a new CPU. Those three components alone are more pricy than an X1X. And I just updated my GPU from a 970 to a 1080 last month. The wife had a cow (mooooo) when I told her I was very likely going to be buying more parts this month. I’d just hate to buy buy those parts for a 10fps increase. It all matters on what the game does in prioritizing CPU vs GPU processing. Thats why I want to see people’s results.
I went back and ran the settings a little different. That last post was with everything on the advanced tab set to the max. The next test I did was leaving all advanced tab to dynamic, and then on basic I set the Dynamic Render Quality to Ultra and set resolution to 3840x2160. From there I got MUCH better FPS results:
Max: 57
Average: 44
I wonder what someone running the Ryzen 5 1600x will get by following the same steps with the same GPU?
Runs buttery smooth at 4k/60fps about 99% of the time in game with all settings max except MSAA, which is at 4x. Rare drops to 50ish for half a second in game.
At 1080p with everything max I get 60fps, but sometimes it does 58fps. Not sure whats up with that.
I get around 50 fps in the menus at 4k.
Just to let you know. I have an 8350 at stock speed 4.0 and a GTX 970 running at 2560 x 1440 on all dynamic and get almost solid 60 fps. But I do have much stuttering? Others are also reporting stuttering on YouTube videos.
minimum seems to be in menus or load screens, seems pretty worthless for a stat. Looks like your bottleneck is probably your monitor? With that setup you should be able to run 2k no problem.
What’s really weird is, the game seems to want to stick detail on ‘Very Low’, if I let it. Why would that be? I’m kind of confused, as the Store says I’m under Recommended…
I7 4790 at 3.6 with an Nvidia 980TI and 16gb of ram. Get a 58fps average at 4K with everything completely maxed except antialiasing which I turned off. I never thought to try the AA when I ran the 4K benchmark so I’ll have to see what those results are. The menus seem to take a framerate hit but on track doesn’t which seems odd and there are some small random graphic glitches but framerate seems very solid on track. APEX seems to look more polished and run better for some reason though.
Windows 10 Pro Ver 1703 Build 15063.608
I7-4930K @ 3.4 GHZ
GTX 1070 8 GB VRAM
64GB System Ram
ASUS P9X79WS MB
Raazer Synapse Controller
Razer Kraken Headset and Mic
Benchmark Ultra Default 14.7 FPS Min 61.9 FPS MAX 59.2 FPS AVG although I didn’t notice the low min FPS during actual “race”
1080p
Textures on Ultra, rest on High (particles on dynamic), no v-sync. 8xMSAA.
Min: 10.4 FPS
Max: 60.2 FPS
Average: 59.8 FPS.
I ran it multiple times, every time the results were slightly different (+ / - 0.5 FPS difference on Average FPS)
No FPS drops/stutters ingame whatsoever, I’m sure I could run it at full Ultra @ 1080p, but until they remove the FPS lock (I’m on a 144 Hz monitor) I can’t say what difference high and ultra make FPS wise.
