A comparison would be nice. I’ve seen a few people talk about this so I don’t doubt that your right, I’d just like to see the difference.
As for horizon 5, that wouldn’t make sense. Horizon interpolates between real photos of skies and clouds. Motorsport generates it’s own procedurally. It should be completely different, and the way clouds move if you look closely proves as much.
These are different lighting conditions, and prerelease to the current update are far too different to use as a comparison. If you could math the conditions in the current update to your other screenshots, that’d be really helpful.
Here are more shots. I’ve tested across several tracks. The clouds are noticeably different. The game still uses old clouds in some older career stuff but new series are usually with the new clouds.
Here’s the best I could do for a quick comparison:
The lighting also changed with the new clouds. I’ve found a bunch of old screenshots so I’ll try to compare those with the new ones tomorrow but I think it’s pretty clear this is a big change.
Going to need more detail here. Asside from RTGI I have no reason to believe you’re wrong, but you may be making some pretty large assumptions.
How so, are they sharper and higher resolution? I assume they’re still screenspace right?
Again, how so? From what I’ve seen, the colour grading got improved (though still has issues) so there’s more colour and contrast but the lighting tech is pretty much the same. Some examples or explanations could be useful to determine if it’s better art direction, better colour grading, or actually better tech.
I can guarantee this is not the case. RTGI is either on, or it’s not. The surfel GI that already exists may have received some improvements maybe? You’d notice an immediate performance hit and a vastly different image if it was RTGI. Assuming things that look good = RT is a big contributor to confusion over how RT actually works.
Microsoft employ coders on a binding 18 month contract where they cannot work in the industry for 6 months after contract.
If you work for microsoft 18 months and one day, you get medical and benefits.
They have created an employment model that means no-one stays on a project long enough to perform optimally. The geeks at Turn 10 are there for a resume boost. Not for love of motorsport.
One environment artist has exposed this after his NDA expired. He made the Grand Oak scenery. Then lost his team leader, and was expected to take up the slack.
Notice the copy/paste in other track environments, and then look at the beautiful and unique scenery around the track (his waterfall is beautiful), then look at the copypasta that came when he was told to do 2 jobs at once.
I haven’t looked into this thread since a while, but yes I think the clouds have a bit higher resolution now. I complained a few months ago about it, I am happy they do something about it.
Because acknowledging the addition of features would require acknowledging the previous lack of said feature, possibly after it had already been promised.
Anything to pretend everything is business as usual.