In past games there’s been an at or about BASE SETTING for camber for each class… like 3.0 and 2.5 for S class or higher…
Have you all noticed what camber settings are a pretty good all around starting point for each of the classes?
In past games there’s been an at or about BASE SETTING for camber for each class… like 3.0 and 2.5 for S class or higher…
Have you all noticed what camber settings are a pretty good all around starting point for each of the classes?
I used to go way over -1. Like 2.7/2.3. Now that l’ve been using telemetry more, l’ve realized this is way too much. I’ve found…for offroad tunes at least, that my front being around -1 gives a great contact patch. Perfect tire temperatures, and the screen before (tires/general) l flip between negative and positive camber any time l’m on uneven terrain. lmo that’s the two best indicators that you’re getting a good contact patch. That being said, l use math to get a proper spread between the two, taking the weight distribution into account. Bare with me. For a 60/40 split. Divide 60 by 40 and you get 1.5. This is my first step when tuning anything…getting my spread right. For a 60 front, l’ll run a -.9 front and -.6 rear. 60/40 is easy, just be aware, you don’t want any decimal points when figuring out your numbers. For example, a 56 front, l set at .7 and .9. If you divide 9 by 1.273 you get 7.069. 8 divided by 1.273 is 6.28. That .28 will be noticeable. So, 9 and 7 is much better than 6 and 8, because it’s theoretically going to be laying completely flat…or evenly flat anyway. If you want to go with higher camber, by all means, do so, but l highly advise doing this short math to make sure you’re as close as possible to a whole number. Those little fractions/decimals at the end can make a huge difference. Check the telemetry, too. I’m always within a couple of degrees in temperature between all four tires.
Some examples for common weight distribution:
60/40: -.6 rear, -.9 front
58/42: -.5 rear, -.7 front
56/44: -.7 rear, -.9 front
54/46: -.6 rear, -.7 front
Again, l used to run super high camber, but struggled with traction coming out of corners. Once l started checking my telemetry, l realized my contact patch was way outta whack. Also, my castor was way off, so my steering was hard to get back to center, and l ended up sideways pretty often when going airborne. I went from around 5.5 degrees to around 4, and noticed a considerable difference in control, and very little difference in turn-in angle/response.
This is all imo, but strongly backed up by telemetry. Good luck.
Like slid3show said, use telemetry and maybe a little bit of math. I usually don’t touch it in FH4 since tuning the suspension gives me enough grip.