Hall of fame

Hi everyone, I have an idea, maybe a suggestion.

It could make the hall of fame more fair to rid the table of the cheaters and keep the genuine guys at the top.

What if it was ranked by the amount of accolades completed, then use total score as a tie break.

So people with 1945/1954 (at the time of writing)
Would.be at the top of the table, with the guy with the most points leading them.

That way more people would play every aspect of the game too and not spend ages trying to fudge the system.

Cheers for your time. What do you think?

It’s been 11 months and leaderboards remain polluted with impossible times. That’s what I think. Good luck with your hall of fame.