A700 C.7 Help (Getting trashed in the Lobbies) Need to fight back!

Community Hub Community Content Tuning
,
21

Hey roadrunner

I knew I needed 2 separate builds and have since focused only on spa for the build you selected. After putting on your build I posted my tune and was asking for your input tune wise to dial out some understeer. Definitely was not complaining about the build.

Hope that clears up any misunderstanding

22

Bump is too high
Rebound may be a little low (not sure here)
You can try 2.0 caster and see if it helps.

Practice

23

I’ll take the bump down a notch and eval a higher rebound and the caster.

Thanks

24

In my testing of the C7 I determined that car doesn’t need more than 5.7 handling in any class (A or S). my A class 5.5 handling build and 5.7 handling build are at least half a second faster than the current to c7 time at spa (mostly due to the power difference)… A 5.7 handling S class build will top 30 many tracks also. Also Forza aero only, forget about those Hennessy parts unless you want to be hipster.

25

They wont do Top 30 in S Class! And the current time in S Class, on Spa, is with my C7 which can go around a second faster, and that time was done online with a 5.9 Handling build, using no braking line, no TCS and Simulation steering etc. Top 30 is possible but only with a nailed lap!
RR

26

It’s already 25th at Sebring.

27

hm

28

29

27th at spa S class. (still more time)

30

With TCS =]

31

Here we go with the TCS junk. The real car has it and quit elevating yourself because you turn something off. Turn it on and beat it or hush.

32

Lol!
Not on about beating it, stop jumping to conclusions + don’t cause an argument, your suppose to be a moderator!
RR

33

I am a moderator and I’m not causing an argument. I will clue you in on what happened. Lou came into the thread in an attempt to help the OP. Some kid named Roadrunner posted this as a reply.

Who created the argument? Who said something untrue? Do you even realize what you post half the time?

You do realize this whole “suppose(d) to be a moderator” talk has had you warned already right? Do you remember that conversation?

1 Like
34

Personal Attacks now… well done!
RR

35

and a personal ban to go with it.

36

Ouch… Oh Dear,

Anyways … Back on topic. I guess ill have to turn the tcs on in this instance because the time i am chasing at spa … has TCS on. In addition to that … if i lower the bump to say 2.x it becomes a lot more squeamish putting the power down… (The rival in the replay appeared to have the same problem) which looks to bring me right back to … TCS.

So Lou on your 5.7 handling build did you still do max weight reduction and run the stock size tyres or did you give up a little weight and balanced it out with a little more tyre width ? I tried the stock tyre size but it doesn’t free up enough pi to go shopping for worthwhile power upgrades.

Thanks

Maxis

37

TCS is likely faster, it’s also a realistic thing so if you want to turn it on don’t be afraid or ashamed to do so.

If your goal is to get going as fast as possible then turn it on, not doing so is no different than running the wrong build. If you want to do it as fast as possible without then it is your game and choice but TCS is faster in this car/class.

38

How long does a personal ban last? I was hoping Roadrunner would be posting some open source tunes I requested. Thanks.

39

I was hoping he would help with some maths for me .

I run ABS always and TCS only in RWD in 4wd or FWD then it’s off

I hope it’s not a ban for life?

40

+1